|
All power to the museums!
Article in the newspaper Sankt-Peterbugskiye Vedomosti
28 September 2011 (N 182)
The Russian Council of Museums recently held a meeting in Khabarovsk.
Khabarovsk is a place where different cultures converge. Russian culture
was brought there by settlers, strengthened by the Soviet Union and now
has strong roots. The cultures of China and Korea and Japan are very close.
However, you can’t take exhibitions there. This is not just because it
is very far, but because it is too expensive. It is cheaper to fly to
New York. What sponsor would be willing to provide enough money to bring
a serious exhibition to Khabarovsk? Transport problems need to be resolved
somehow. I can’t believe that you can get a cheap ticket to Paris but
not to Khabarovsk.
There are wonderful museums in Khabarovsky Krai which preserve the memory
of Russian culture there.
The most important museum in Khabarovsk is the Khabarovsk Regional Museum
after N.I. Grodekov. It is the only museum in Russia which, even in Soviet
times, kept the name of the general-governor. In the far east, cultural
and museum life was not promoted by Decembrists, like in Irkutsk, nor
by wealthy people, like in Tomsk and Omsk, but by military people and
geographers. The general-governor Grodekov, who suppressed revolts in
China, founded this museum.
Today, when Russian museums are struggling to retain their right to conduct
research, our Khabarovsk colleagues already have this right. We have discussed
with the minister of defence the fate of military museums which the ministry
is finding difficult to maintain. In the Far East this is not a problem.
Discussions are being held on including the Far East military district
museum in the Grodekov museum.
What is happening in Khabarovsk gives reason for optimism. The significance
of museums is understood there and it seems that they are important for
the authorities.
We often, and with some justification, say that culture is not considered
important in our country. At the same time, there are no other countries
where kings and presidents sign orders on celebrating anniversaries of
cultural institutions. This is not just about the 250th anniversary of
the Hermitage. Anniversary orders were also issued for the Pushkin Museum
of Fine Arts and the Public Library. This shows a respect for culture.
The organising committee for celebrating the anniversary of the Hermitage,
which will take place in 2014, has just met. We showed the commission
the reconstruction of the General Staff, restoration projects, including
the project for laser cleaning of the Small Throne Room panel and events
for the coming years were discussed.
The media have concentrated on the money that the museum will receive,
12-13 billion roubles. So far there is no money. There is a list of events
and an estimate of how much money would be needed to do them all. As deputy
Prime-Minister Dmitry Kozak said, the Hermitage development plan was discussed.
We are not planning super anniversary exhibitions abroad, songs, dances
or concerts. There will probably be a concert on Palace Square or in the
courtyard of the Winter Palace. Guests will come, but at their own initiative
and expense. This is where we differ from other anniversary holders.
We are asking for money for reconstructing the east wing of the General
Staff, for completing construction of the open archive in Staraya Derevnya
and the creation of an archaeological archive, a publishing centre and
a library.
The creation of an exhibition hall in the old stables and riding hall
of the Small Hermitage is also in this list. At the moment they hold the
archives, but after their transfer to Staraya Derevnya an exhibition space
with its own entrance might appear. Then along the Small Hermitage a passage
will open from Palace Square to the Neva embankment. This will create
a flow of people to Palace Square, which will increase its city forming
role. There will be a passage from the Moika Embankment through the General
Staff building to the square. Inside the General Staff will be cafes,
restaurants, shops...
The anniversary plans include new buildings in the Reserve Palace on
Palace Embankment next to the Hermitage Theatre. This will house an archive
and restoration workshops which occupy beautiful Hermitage buildings.
Then we will be able to restore the antique vase and carved stone halls
and the palace church.
The church will be an exhibition and a holy place. There is a project
to restore the iconostasis. The church will house the best Russian and
Byzantine icons from our collection. We want to create a memorial place
for the Romanov imperial family. The Hermitage has many personal items
from the royal family, for example the New Testament, which was inherited.
All this will be displayed in the church. There will not be anything too
extravagant. A church is a place for praying. We propose to hold a special
mass once a year. On the 25 December, the day the enemy was expelled from
Russia in 1812. Every year on this day a prayer service and military parade
were held in the palace.
The General Staff building, a new exhibition hall, the open archive and
restoration projects is the museum’s development plan. The organising
committee examined it in detail. All we need to do is provide a detailed
justification for each point. Only then will we be allocated money.
Of course there will be anniversary exhibitions. We will display items
the museum has acquired over the last twenty years, the history of hermitage
archaeology and restoration and museum design.
At the organising committee meeting I said that the Hermitage is like
an engine for our culture. When we do something, and do it successfully,
then it becomes easier for others. Now everybody knows than the Hermitage’s
open archive is the best. People come from all over the world to see how
we have built it all. Our site was an example for many years. Reconstruction
of the General Staff building is an example of how it is possible to place
new content in old architecture.
Let me repeat myself: we haven’t received an anniversary present, but
agreement to implement the Hermitage development plan. We are being given
what we should have been given long ago. A great deal of work awaits us.
The organising committee also discussed the museum’s new charter. This
is also important, and not everyone understands its significance. This
concerns the Hermitage’s special status. All museums are good, there are
no big or small ones. However, the Hermitage is a world class museum which
is also a memorial of Russian nationhood. Since 1996 when the Hermitage
was mentioned in a presidential order, it has a separate line in the state
budget, and is under protection of the Head of the Russian Federation.
There are no sub-legislative acts or budget increases. This is evidence
of the honour which helps the museum work.
Everything in our country is now becoming homogenous, including the charters
of cultural institutions. For our 250th anniversary we asked, as a present,
that the Hermitage charter is approved by the government of the Russian
Federation and not the Ministry of Culture. This does not give the museum
any additional freedom, other than confirming its special status. In France,
for example, the Louvre has a special position.
One other thing... People have been asking me why, not being a member
of United Russia or the People’s Front, I decided to stand for election.
I have given not just my name but the name of the Hermitage to support
the list which, in my opinion, guarantees a certain stability for the
immediate future.
The United Russia list has its specifics. It includes people who are
not party members. Whenever we organise a party we somehow end up with
the CPSU. I know this very well from when I was involved in setting up
Our Home - Russia. So that we don’t end up with the CPSU again, it is
necessary to attract people who can talk openly about important issues
and who will be listened to.
We live in difficult times. Everywhere we hear, "don’t rock the
boat". There are many problems and crises on the horizon. I am an orientalist and I watch what is happening in the Middle East. I am asked,
"is what is happening there what we have already had or what may
happen?" The second idea is very possible. Therefore, I think that
we need to support stability.
I don’t value the mechanism of elections as a feature of democracy as
much as the ability to use the moment when cultural workers are listened
to. Our task now is to be listened to.
Culture is outside politics. But when you work in culture, you need to
try and use politics. There are completely concrete things, defence of
museums from raiders, privatisation... We can see what is happening around
conservation museums whose borders are being constantly encroached. Elections
give the opportunity to talk louder about the protection of cultural rights,
in particular St. Petersburg’s urban environment. Russian intelligentsia
has great experience in using political situations for cultural interests.
Krasnoyarsk museums have issued a t-shirt with the inscription "All
power to the museums". There is a poster in Khabarovsk with the same
slogan.
http://www.spbvedomosti.ru/article.htm?id=10280501@SV_Articles
|