|
"No Cheaper nor more Expensive"
Interview with the paper Moskovskie Novosti 14 December 2007
MN: Mikhail Borisovich, what is the relationship between society and
the development of culture?
M.B. Piotrovsky: I think that culture and cultural establishments are
closely connected with society, since our task is to bring all achievements
in culture and the arts to the people. That is to say PR is also an essential
part of our work. We communicate with society, in particular, using PR
consultants and journalists, since it is necessary to show the particular
value of our cultural heritage both to the wider public as well as a the
small group of people in government.
MN: Are there difficult cultural points where the resources of PR
specialists are especially valuable?
M.B.: Yes, I think so. One of these difficult points is explaining what
culture is and how it differs from ‘popular culture'. This distinction
is not overly clear. One person might think that popular culture is part
of culture in general, another might consider them to be different. Is
the mass media part of culture? And what about television? Is it a part
of culture, propaganda or something quite different? The second point
is underlining the significance of culture as something more important
than economics, politics and the like. We must also show, explain and
encourage the understanding of the true significance of culture like economics,
as a part of national consciousness.
MN: And what is it that you as a PR "customer" would like to receive?
Ì.Á.: More attention on what we would like and what we actually have
in mind. Sometimes things occur which are not immediately clear for people,
or those who write about us, to understand. We would like people to understand
these things better and to evaluate them at a deeper rather than superficial
level. Recently in a well-known Moscow newspaper an article was published
about the skating rink on Palace Square. There is a phrase: "It would
be better to go to the State Hermitage Museum, where tickets are in the
meantime cheaper ". That "for the meantime" is typical for the gutter
press. So I will take the opportunity to explain myself: at the State
Hermitage Museum we do have an entirely social pricing policy, which does
give everyone the possibility of visiting the State Hermitage Museum for
free for those who need it: pensioners, students, school children. We
do this despite of the law: we do not have the right to do so, but we
find the means. We endlessly explain that this didn't happen by accident
but is a deliberate policy and not a simplistic approach of "here,
a bit more expensive - there slightly cheaper". The unwillingness
to understand such nuances is insulting since we spend our resources developing
such policies. We would like people involved in PR to delve deeper into
such things and talk about not only the events but also their intrinsic
value, which we create through these events
MN: Is the problem of "Black PR" or libel relevant to your
area of work?
M.B.: Yes, extremely. We encountered this when the thefts occurred and
a huge amount of material came out about the State Hermitage Museum which
was not only negative but clearly distorted the situation, aimed at blackening
the museum's reputation, this was "black PR". We had come across it before
when information was published with a view to creating a negative image
of the museum rather than to talk about the museum. But that was a completely
different matter. A general tendency to blackmail and extortion was behind
this, trying to force the museum to put part of its collection onto the
market... There may be internal or external political goals behind this
as well as economic motives. We come across such problems in the cultural
sphere very frequently.
ÌN: And how do you deal with them?
Ì.B.: With the aid of our friends who are journalists and those who understand
that cultural institutions are suffering from cultural problems. It is
not easy: they, the "whites" using only legal methods, have significantly
fewer opportunities than the "blacks", since negative news is always received
with greater excitement than positive news.
ÌN: Meanwhile, PR professionals, politicians and public figures talk
about creating a positive image for Russia. How do you think such an image
is created and maintained?
Ì.B.: I think that a positive image for our country can be created first
and foremost by considering our cultural legacy and how we relate to that
legacy. The State Hermitage Museum is one of the greatest cultural symbols
of our country, because it is specifically the State Hermitage which is
a large, universal museum which displays all cultures which existed in
Russia. It is one of those things which makes Russia European. We are
a part of European culture, but geographically are not part of Europe
- the State Hermitage Museum is the evidence of this. And how the country
relates to the State Hermitage Museum and how the museum develops, will
be a sign for how they will judge Russia. If the State Hermitage Museum
astounds the world with its exhibitions, it means that Russia is strong
and that we do have something to be proud of. There are few things which
created such a positive image for Russia as Sokurov's film Russian Ark.
It had a huge success around the world. I have been at numerous showings
and people watch with pleasure the positive historical image of Russia,
the Russia they know from Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Gogol, Shostakovich, Mandelshtam,
Akhmatova: This is a somber Russia, but it is sincere, a Russia with a
high level of culture, a Russia with its own problems but a Russia which
in its heart is wonderful. Our art bears out such a Russia, and people
really do want to see it.
|